You are in: Home » Publications » Reports » Report 16
SCAR Report No 16, April 1999
SCAR Antarctic Offshore Stratigraphy Project (ANTOSTRAT)
Report of a Workshop on
Antarctic Late Phanerozoic Earth System Science
Hobart, Australia, July 6-11, 1997
Compiled by
Peter-N. Webb, Department of Geological Sciences and Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH, 43210 USA, E-mail: webb.3@osu.edu
and
Alan K. Cooper, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 999, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park,
CA 94025 USA, E-mail: acooper@usgs.gov
Note: The pagination for the electronic version of the report is based on the U.S. 8.5x11 inch paper format, not on the A4 paper format. The report will print on A4 paper, but page numbers will differ.
Contents
Executive Summary........................................................................................
4
Introduction ......................................................................................................
5
Consesus Statement Developed at Workshop Plenary Session........... 7
Summary Statements on Data Bases, Current and Planned Projects, Technology and
Thematic and Regional Earth Science Issues .........9
Introduction ................................................................................................................ 9
Late Phanerozoic Global Change Challenges
Data bases, current and planned projects, and technology issues ............................. 9
ANTOSTRAT Seismic Data Library System (SDLS)
ANTOSTRAT Antarctic Margin Ocean Drilling Program Initiatives
Deep Stratigraphic Drilling Outside the ODP Organization
Shallow Drilling Technology and Sampling of Late Phanerozoic Targets
Thematic Issues ............................................................................................................ 12
- Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic Plate Tectonic and Crustal History of Antarctica
- Geological Time, and Relative and Absolute Dating Systems
- Continental Shelf Sedimentary Basins
- Paleoceanography and Circum-Antarctic Deep Sea Marine Biosphere History
- Glaciomarine Sedimentary Processes, Events and Stratigraphy
- Terrestrial Geology
- Antarctic Seismic Stratigraphy
- Seismic Characterization and Physical Properties
- Paleoclimate Modeling of Glacial and Climatic History
Regional Earth Science Issues..................................................................................... 19
- Antarctic Peninsula
- Weddell Sea
- Prydz Bay Region
- Wilkes Land Margin
- Ross Sea
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... 25
FIGURES AND CAPTIONS ....................................................................................... 26-32
APPENDICES .............................................................................................................. 33
- 1. ANTOSTRAT Steering Committee ......................................................................... 33
2. Workshop Participants ............................................................................................. 33
3. Selected References ................................................................................................. 34
4. ANTOSTRAT Workshop Program: Agenda and Format ....................................... 36
5. Report on Hobart Workshop published in EOS ...................................................... 41
6. Three documents related to the evolution and implementation of
the ANTOSTRAT subcommittee - July 1997 to July 1998 ................................... 45- 6A. Response to Consensus Statement on Hobart Workshop, by
SCAR Executive Committee - August, 1997 .................................................... 456B. Recommendations taken to SCAR XXV Meeting
(Concepcion, Chile; July, 1998) ........................................................................ 456C. Recommendation approved by SCAR Delegates
at SCAR XXV (Concepcion, Chile; July, 1998) .............................................. 47
7. Working Papers On Data Bases, Current And Planned Projects, Technologies,
Thematic And Regional Earth Science Issues Prepared For Hobart Workshop ...................... 50- 7.1 Webb: Late Phanerozoic Antarctica: Global Change Challenges
At Macro-, Meso- And Micro-temporal Scales ................................. 51 - 7.2 Cooper and Brancolini: Antostrat Seismic Data Library
System For Cooperative Research (SDLS) ....................................... 55 - 7.3 Barker: ANTOSTRAT Ocean Drilling Program Initiative ............................ 59
- 7.4 Barrett: Deep Stratigraphic Drilling In The Antarctic Outside ODP........................ 63
- 7.5 Kristoffersen: Approaches To Marine Shallow Drilling On The Antarctic Shelf................... 65
- 7.6 Elliot: The Late Mesozoic And Cenozoic Plate Tectonic And Crustal
History Of Antarctica: Implications For Marine And Terrestrial Sequences............ 67 - 7.7 Barrett: Continental Shelf Sedimentary Basins ............................................. 74
- 7.8 Wise: Mesozoic-Paleogene Paleoceanography And Marine Biosphere: Key Events................... 76
- 7.9 Powell: Glacier-Sea Interactions And The Utililty Of Process Studies For
Interpreting The Antarctic Glacial And Climatic Record On Different Time Scales ............................... 83 - 7.10 Webb: The Late Phanerozoic Terrestrial Realm ............................................. 87
- 7.11 Cooper: Antarctic Seismic Stratigraphy: Status, Questions and Future Priorities............. 91
- 7.12 Solheim: Seismic Stratigraphy And Sedimentary Properties: A Need For Ground Truth......... 97
- 7.13 Oglesby: Paleoclimate Modeling of Antarctica: What It Has Done ?, What It Can Do? ....... 102
- 7.14 Barker: Antarctic Peninsula Region ............................................................... 105
- 7.15 Jokat: Weddell Sea, Lazarev Sea, Riiser-Larsen Sea Region ........................ 106
- 7.16 O'Brien and Leitchenkov: Prydz Bay And Mac.Robertson Shelf Region .......... 111
- 7.17 Escutia: Late Phanerozoic (100-0 Ma) Studies On The Wilkes Land Margin ..........................115
- 7.18 Davey: The Ross Sea Region: Geology Of The Last 100 Ma .......................... 121
- 6A. Response to Consensus Statement on Hobart Workshop, by
Executive Summary
In June 1996, the Antarctic Offshore Stratigraphy Programme (ANTOSTRAT) was tasked by the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), to convene a workshop in Hobart, Australia. The purpose was to gather a representative group of interested Antarctic Earth scientists to outline critical themes for investigation of Antarctic paleoenvironments during Cretaceous and Cenozoic times (the last 130 million years), and to recommend objectives and priorities for the next decade. A group of 40 scientists from 11 countries met for this purpose in July 1997 along side a parallel workshop for the Antarctic Ice Margin Environment Group (ANTIME), which focuses on the last 200,000 years. This report details the background, discussions, findings and recommendations of the ANTOSTRAT workshop.
The workshop recognized the extensive seismic database already organized through ANTOSTRAT, and the value of the Seismic Data Library System (SDLS), in developing Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) proposals for circum-Antarctic drilling (Antarctic Peninsula, Ross Sea, Wilkes Land, Prydz Bay, Weddell Sea), as well as the fast-ice drilling of Cape Roberts (McMurdo Sound). Participants reviewd and confirmed the necessity for geologic sampling of continental shelf and rise deposits, acknowledging the direct but incomplete record of the shelf and the indirect but more complete record of the rise. They also supported the importance of shallow drilling and coring of different sectors of the Antarctic, recognizing the major differences in behavior and timing of glaciation between East and West Antarctic ice. With the new round of large-scale drilling programs about to begin (ODP Leg 178 (Antarctic Peninsula) and Cape Roberts drilling), it was considered important to maintain momentum toward future drilling. At the same time, the group saw the need to focus on the use of data from sediment cores (age, depositional environment, paleoclimate) in improving scenarios of past ice and climate behaviour through ice sheet and climate modeling.
The workshop concluded that the focus for the next decade (1998-2008) should be the onset and development of Antarctic glaciation, and that this was best pursued through the following activities:
- Gathering geoscience data [especially cores of sedimentary sequences beneath the Antarctic margin] for working with climate and ice sheet modelers in order to
- a. prepare a series of maps of the Antarctic region to illustrate ice and climate
scenarios at selected intervals through Cretaceous and Cenozoic time, and
b. identify the main linkages with the rest of the planet throughout this period.
- promoting and coordinating ODP drilling proposals, as well as interacting with ODP bodies.
- promoting the use of existing sampling systems (coring, Cape Roberts Project drilling etc)
- encouraging the development and the use of new shallow drilling systems.
The plan for the next 4 years (1998-2002) is to work principally on core and sample recovery and interpretations, with some involvement of modelers and sector by sector assessment, followed by a broad review of results at a dedicated symposium in 2002.
The workshop report also outlines the evolution of the project from the initial ANTOSTRAT initiative under the Group of Specialists (1989-1996) to the current ANTOSTRAT committee, under the joint Working Groups on Geology and Solid Earth Geophysics, that was approved by SCAR in July
Introduction
Since the early 1970's, offshore drilling by the Deep Sea Drilling Project and Ocean Drilling Program, and fast-ice drilling in McMurdo Sound, provided major advances in our understanding of Antarctic climatic and tectonic history through Cenozoic times - a period of geographic isolation for the Antarctic continent and one which witnessed the replacement of relatively diverse marine and terrestrial environments by ice sheets. Also during the 1970's and 1980's, seismic surveys of strata beneath the Antarctic continental shelf were conducted by many countries and raised concerns about the use of these data for oil exploration as well as investigation of Cenozoic history. In 1986, a Workshop on Cenozoic Palaeoenvironments was held at the SCAR meeting in San Diego, and from that meeting emerged a plan for a Group of Specialist to coordinate and promote research on this broad topic. This was approved by SCAR and the Group began work in 1988.
At an early stage, it was realized that there needed to be a focus on the growing body of seismic data being collected around the Antarctic margin, both because of its scientific value and also the political sensitivity to possible misuse. This led to the formation of ANTOSTRAT (Antarctic Offshore Stratigraphy Project), which, during a meeting at Asilomar (California) in 1990, set up a series of regional working groups to organize the seismic data in five regions of the Antarctic margin (Fig. 1), and to use these data as the basis for proposals for coring key strata in each region, under the aegis of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP).
In August 1996, the Group of Specialists on Cenozoic Paleoenvironments of the Southern High Latitudes (GOSC) concluded its 10-year term, by reporting its activities to the Working Group on Geology, the Working Group On Solid-Earth Geophysics, and the SCAR delegates at XXIV SCAR, Cambridge. GOSC was able to point to an extremely active decade of workshops, conferences, and successful initiatives involving Ocean Drilling Program and non-ODP drilling programs. However, there was a general feeling within the SCAR Earth Science Working Groups that continuing coordination of seismic activities and strenuous promotion of drilling activities would be required well beyond 1996 in order to maintain the momentum achieved over the past decade.
The Group of Specialists (GOSC) proposed, via a document circulated in advance of the SCAR meeting, that the joint working groups request that a new Group of Specialists on Late Phanerozoic Earth System Science be established. After extensive discussions, the joint working groups concluded that (SCAR Bulletin No. 126 , July 1997, page 20, item 8a through d)
"such prioritization and coordination (of future Late Phanerozoic science activities) require further thought that is probably best organized through the medium of an open Workshop, and that a new Group of Specialists is highly desirable, but could be much better formulated as an outcome of the Workshop deliberations, and then proposed to XXV SCAR. " (Item 8d)
SCAR Delegates then recommended that the successful ANTOSTRAT Project be extended for two years as the ANTOSTRAT Programme to accomplish two principal tasks:
- Coordinate scientific drilling/coring projects, including those of the Ocean Drilling Program, for the Antarctic margin and
- Convene a workshop in Hobart, Australia, during the period 6-11 July 1997 to outline important topics and priorities for the next decade of geoscience research in Antarctica.
ANTOSTRAT convened such a workshop at Hobart, at the same time as the ANTIME (Antarctic Ice Margin) group conducted a similar meeting. The two groups have many earth science thematic, climatic, and process-oriented interests in common but work on distinctly different time scales. Whereas ANTIME focuses on the last 200,000 years, the ANTOSTRAT group considers relationships and interactions within the Geosphere-Hydrosphere-Biosphere over the past 130 million years (Cretaceous-Cenozoic) of Earth history. The ANTOSTRAT Workshop at Hobart identified and discussed the most critical Cretaceous-Cenozoic earth science issues, priorities and goals for the next decade. Scientists from eleven SCAR nations contributed to this planning workshop. This report provides a record of the meeting and its recommendations.
Before the workshop, coordinators for each major thematic issue and geographic region were identified. These individuals compiled background information and lists of important unresolved research topics. Their contributions, mostly as submitted, form Appendix 7 of this report. The draft report was circulated to all participants prior to the workshop. In Hobart, the thematic issues and regional imperatives were discussed, priorities were assigned to research directions, and recommendations made. The body of this report lists the results of those discussions. The final task of the workshop was to attain a consensus statement from the research community, as to how SCAR could facilitate this research.
The consensus statement from the workshop (see next section) emphasized the need for acquiring geologic samples via coring and drilling in support of paleoenvironmental studies. The statement was subsequently reviewed by SCAR Executive and then rephrased by the ANTOSTRAT Steering Committee into a series of three recommendations to SCAR (Appendix 6A,B), to establish a special SCAR subgroup that, like its predecessor ANTOSTRAT would facilitate and coordinate implementation of the above field and laboratory studies.
A revised version of the draft workshop report, including the three recommendations, was circulated to all members of SCAR Executive and the Working Groups on Geology and Solid Earth Geophysics prior to the SCAR XXV meeting (Concepcion, Chile; July, 1998). In Concepcion, extensive discussions led to a formal recommendation from the Joint Working Groups (JWG) (Appendix 6C) that an ANTOSTRAT Subcommittee under the JWG be established to accomplish the above tasks. The JWG recommendation was subsequently approved by SCAR delegates during the SCAR XXV meeting.
The activities of the Hobart Workshop and the actions at SCAR XXIV and XXV described in the following report reflect the major efforts by a broad cross-section of Antarctic earth-science community to define important research directions for the coming decade, and how they can best be accomplished.
It is hoped that this report will be a useful tool for all National Antarctic Programs.
Consesus Statement Developed at Workshop Plenary Session
The following statement was developed during the Hobart workshop and accepted by a consensus vote of all workshop participants, representing 11 countries.
"*Coordinating Committee on
Antarctic Glaciation - Onset and Development
The Antarctic continent has, on account of its polar position over the last 130 million years, had a profound and fundamental effect on the Earth's climate history and palaeoenvironments over this time. It is also a region most sensitive to future climate change. Therefore it is of extreme importance to document the variations in Antarctic ice sheet history since the transition from the warm Cretaceous period (130-65 million years) through the "dynamic" ice sheets of the early Cenozoic to the more or less persistent ice sheet of the present, as well as to understand the mechanisms behind ice volume fluctuations within this time frame. The long time perspective is necessary because temperature-forcing atmospheric gases, such as CO2, have already exceeded Quaternary interglacial values by around 30% and continue to rise. Climate scenarios for the next centuries should therefore take into account scenarios for pre-Quaternary Antarctica.
Past SCAR-sponsored activities (the Group of Specialists on Cenozoic Paleoenvironments and its ANTOSTRAT project) have set a solid basis for a qualitative documentation of the evolution of the Antarctic ice sheet, through syntheses of seismic stratigraphic studies around the Antarctic margin. These studies have led to an appreciation of the complexity of behavior of past ice sheets, with the possibility of substantial variations from one region to another. There is now a need to go beyond the reconnaissance level of understanding reached, by identifying new research approaches, both thematically and geographically. An essential requirement is obtaining "ground truth" by drilling in order to calibrate and extend our seismic interpretations, which have been largely responsible for present models of glacial processes.
We wish to propose through the Working Groups of Geology and Solid Earth Geophysics that SCAR establish a new *Coordinating Committee to promote and coordinate a range of programs to investigate the onset and development of Antarctic glaciation. These would include ground-truthing our seismic interpretations through the Ocean Drilling Program, through other existing coring and drilling systems, and through shallow drilling techniques currently under development.
The ultimate goal of the group is a series of scenarios illustrating Antarctic geography, climate, ice and sheets at selected intervals through Cretaceous and Cenozoic time. This will need to involve close interaction with climate and ice sheet modelers. In addition, the work proposed will lead to improvements in the range of models used for interpreting the sedimentary record, as well as to a much improved understanding of links between geography, climate, ice sheet and sea level responses, along with interactions with other parts of our planetary system.
1998. It is hoped that this document will be a useful tool for all
National Antarctic Programs.
back
to top
Task for the new group
To investigate the onset and development of Antarctic glaciation by:
- Gathering geoscience data for working with climate and ice sheet modelers to
- a. prepare a series of maps of the Antarctic region to illustrate ice and climate
scenarios at selected intervals through Cretaceous and Cenozoic time, and
b. identify the main linkages with the rest of the planet throughout this period.
- promoting and coordinating ODP drilling proposals, as well as interacting with ODP bodies.
- promoting the use of existing sampling systems (coring, Cape Roberts Project drilling etc)
- encouraging the development and the use of new shallow drilling systems."
* the statement from the Hobart Workshop called for either a Group of Specialists or a Coordinating Committee. Subsequent discussion has persuaded the ANTOSTRAT Steering Committee that a Coordinating Committee would be the appropriate body to set up to achieve the goals of the community. As a postscript, at SCAR XXV (July 1998), the name approved was the ANTOSTRAT Subcommittee.
Summary Statements on Data Bases, Current and Planned Projects, Technology and Thematic and Regional Earth Science Issues
Introduction
Late Phanerozoic Global Change Challenges: The last 130 million years of the Phanerozoic Eon (Cretaceous, Tertiary, and Quaternary Periods) were marked by major latitudinal and longitudinal transport of continents, significant interaction between plates, very active sea floor spreading and evolution toward modern ocean configurations (Fig. 2). Further, these global events were also associated with ever-evolving ocean current circulation systems, eustatic oscillations, major biotic adjustments, at time rapid organic evolution, significant shifts in the demarcation of biogeographic province boundaries, and the transition from a "warm" hothouse Earth to a "cold" bipolar icehouse Earth. It is generally accepted that these and other geological phenomena are linked in an over-arching Earth System that involves an interrelation between the paleo-geosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere.
What has been the role of continental Antarctica and the south polar oceans in global late Phanerozoic earth system science? The earth science community in general, and the south polar research community in particular accept, that the Antarctic region has affected geological history in other regions of the globe, particularly during the last ~50 million years. Geologic and climatic events in the lower latitudes also impacted the southern high latitude record intervals of the Late Phanerozoic.
The Hobart Workshop provided an opportunity for a cross-section of the earth science community to review the vast progress made in the southern high latitudes in the past four decades since the International Geophysical Year (1957-58), and to identify and discuss the most important unresolved earth science research issues. Earth scientists have advanced from the initial reconnaissance phases to now, when we have diverse and comprehensive data bases, and advanced land- and sea-based technologies. Most importantly, the south-polar earth-science sub disciplines have recently moved to promote investigation of thematic and process issues, generate hypotheses, test hypotheses, and consider linkages between related and disparate data bases within and beyond the south polar realm.
The central concept behind the 1997 Hobart Workshop was a comprehensive preview of the next decade (1998-2008), with special emphasis on where and how to promote the further development of thematic and geographic data bases in all sub disciplines; and integration of these with major global programs that share the same basic objectives (Webb, Appendix 7.1, this report).
Data Bases, Current And Planned Projects, And Technology Issues
ANTOSTRAT Seismic Data Library System (SDLS): The Antarctic Seismic Data Library System provides open access to multichannel seismic reflection data collected by all countries (Fig. 3) that have been involved in Antarctic geophysical research, to facilitate large-scale cooperative research programs. In 1991 the SDLS was formally implemented under Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) Recommendation XVI-12. The SDLS has established library branches in 10 countries and provides three principal functions, i.e. education, data protection, and data storage. The SDLS operates under the general auspices of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, and is currently overseen by the ANTOSTRAT Project. Management costs are underwritten by the U.S. National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Osservatorio Geofisico Sperimentale (Trieste, Italy). Until the end of 1998 SDLS will be overseen by the SCAR ANTOSTRAT Project; thereafter the SDLS will be associated with either the Working Group On Solid-Earth Geophysics or a new SCAR-appointed Group of Specialists or Coordinating Committee (Cooper and Brancolini, Appendix 7.2, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- A Workshop should be convened, with the participation of the entire MCS data collection community, to review the Seismic Data Library System (SDLS) operating guidelines and technologies to be used in the coming decade. An ad-hoc committee should be established to work on technical issues of updating and upgrading the Seismic Data Library System. New procedures need to be outlined and implemented to assure timely submission of data to the SDLS.
- Establish links to the SCAR Antarctic master data directory and their associated data management groups.
- Complete submittal and input of all onshore and offshore multichannel seismic-reflection (MCS) data in SEG-Y format, with navigation, older than 4 years to the SDLS.
- Make images of Antarctic MCS data openly accessible via the World Wide Web, at a resolution compatible with the SDLS policies of assuring intellectual property rights.
ANTOSTRAT Antarctic Margin Ocean Drilling Program Initiatives: During the early 1990's it was apparent that the ANTOSTRAT seismic data base was mature enough to be used in planning a comprehensive stratigraphic drilling strategy for several regions of the Antarctic margin. Prime objectives of the coordinated effort were broadly defined to include deciphering the glacial history of the Antarctic continent, to link this history to global records of sea-level oscillations, paleoclimates, paleoceanography, organic (evolution, and atmospheric circulation. Another critical objective was to correlate Antarctic seismic stratigraphy with well-documented and dated sedimentary successions. The ambitious undertaking and acquisition of sedimentary records to depths of 1000m below the sea floor in abyssal water depths demanded involvement with the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP). Direct interactions between ANTOSTRAT and ODP resulted in the preparation and submission of five region drilling proposals. These proposals called for drilling legs on the Pacific margin of the Antarctic Peninsula, in the Weddell Sea, Prydz Bay, the Wilkes Land margin, and the Ross Sea. At the present time (July, 1998), the Antarctic Peninsula program has been completed as ODP Leg 178 (Fig. 4), a drilling leg (Leg 188) in Prydz Bay has tentatively been scheduled for 2000, and the proposals for the three remaining regions are in advanced stages of review and consideration by panels of the Ocean Drilling Program (Barker, Appendix 7.3, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Continue to strengthen and promote the remaining ANTOSTRAT/ODP proposals as they continue through ODP's panel-review structure, to becoming mature proposals ready for drilling, if scheduled by ODP.
- Seek support from National Antarctic Programs to provide an ice-picket ship (or a National Program vessel) for each of the ODP drilling legs. The ice-picket ship is mandatory for aiding high-latitude drilling.
- Maintain close and active interactions with ODP as this organization charts its future global drilling program and operations schedule; and continue to develop thematic arguments for continued deep ship-based drilling early in the next century.
Deep Stratigraphic Drilling In Antarctica Outside The ODP Organization: Knowledge of geology of the Antarctic continental shelf and surrounding deep ocean basins has benefited from past DSDP and ODP drilling campaigns (Legs 28, 35, 113, 114, 119, 120, and 178) between 1972 and 1998. Terrestrial programs such as the land-based Dry Valley Drilling Project, and littoral sea ice-based MSSTS, CIROS and Cape Roberts Project have also contributed a wealth of additional stratigraphic, chronostratigraphic, basin history and paleoclimate data to the Ross Sea sector of Antarctica, and strengthened linkages with the above-mentioned DSDP and ODP activities. (Barrett, Appendix 7.4, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Maintain a strong technical and organizational knowledge base on drilling operations in many environments, e.g. on-land, ice sheets, ice shelves, marginal sea ice, etc.
- Due to the fact that such drilling ventures are complex, costly, and that planning and execution normally extend over five or more years, it is considered a priority that the effort be an international rather than a single national program undertaking.
- Consider ways in which a variety of advanced drilling and ancillary equipment can be purchased by the Antarctic community, maintained at a high level of operational and maintenance readiness, and in near-constant use.
- Initiate communication with Arctic earth science communities to ascertain whether a degree of shared use of the more modular and portable equipment might be possible.
- Continue to develop a strong science rationale for new drilling areas and sites; at the same time ensuring that adequate site seismic data is available for favored drilling targets.
- Identify priorities for future drilling such as, deep sampling of the Neogene record below Ross Island, sampling the remote sea floor deeps from sea and ice shelf platforms (e.g. Skelton , Beardmore , Byrd, and Drygalski deeps, in up to 1,000m of water), and the Amery Graben basins.
Shallow Drilling Technology And Sampling Of Late Phanerozoic Targets: A variety of conventional bottom sampling devices, such as grabs and corers, have encountered pre-Holocene or pre-Quaternary sediments at or close to the sea floor on Antarctic continental shelves. Seismic stratigraphic data indicate that Neogene, Paleogene and Cretaceous sediments are very widely distributed and may be sampled by devices capable of up to 50 meters penetration. A variety of ship-mounted shallow drilling rigs are used in industry and might be suitable for use in Antarctic waters. The Norwegian Terra Bor System (A/S Terra Bor-Namsos, Norway), now called Geo Drilling, is under development for use in polar environments, with prototypes having undergone one Arctic and two Antarctic seasons of testing. Shallow drilling procedures will allow transect drilling and sampling along dip and strike lines, and allow the construction of composite successions. It will also allow much broader areal coverage of targets than is possible with conventional single site deep drilling techniques (Kristoffersen, Appendix 7.5, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Develop a portable shallow drilling unit that may be mounted on ships and deployed under Antarctic conditions, and over most areas of the Antarctic continental shelf.
- Verify the existence and availability of suitable ship platforms for shallow drilling equipment.
- Encourage a qualified group of scientists obtain the necessary funding for a pilot venture.
- Conduct tests of drilling procedures and ship handling under Antarctic conditions.
- Obtain undisturbed sediment cores more than 50 m in length and in water depths up to 1,000 m.
- Use drillcore recovered by shallow drilling procedures in ground-truthing seismic stratigraphic data.
Thematic Issues
Late Mesozoic And Cenozoic Plate Tectonic And Crustal History Of Antarctica: Much of the Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic geologic history of Antarctica is contained in the sedimentary sequences on the continental shelves. That history, however, in a large measure reflects the evolution of the Antarctic Plate, including both its plate tectonic and its crustal development. The Antarctic Plate was created by the break-up of Gondwanaland and today, except for the Scotia region, is bounded by spreading ridges. The Antarctic continental shelves rimming the East Antarctic craton are passive margins resulting from the separation of southeastern Africa, India, and Australia. The remaining part of the continent has a complex history, which includes fragmentation into microcontinents or blocks, rotations and displacements of those blocks, and subduction and passive margin evolution. In general, the post-break-up history can be divided into: the mid Jurassic to mid Cretaceous, by which time the Antarctic continent had attained its present configuration and essentially polar position; and the mid Cretaceous (130 Ma) to Recent. During the latter time interval break-up between Antarctica and Australia/New Zealand occurred, the link between South America and the Antarctic Peninsula was severed, and events leading up to the present day rift system through West Antarctic ensued (Elliot, Appendix 7.6, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Examine linkages between whole plate-to-regional scale tectonic and structural deformation histories and phases, on the major terrestrial paleotopographic, paleoceanographic, sedimentary basin development, and paleoclimate phases and events, within, around, and well beyond Antarctica; and present these data in a form and scale that is useful in future climate modeling activities.
- Comprehend the relationships between deep ocean circulation gateways and regional tectonic events, in regions such as the East Antarctica-Australia passive margins, and the South America-Antarctic Peninsula connection.
- Investigate the evolution and timing of major rift system development and the histories of associated sedimentary basins, in regions such as the Amery Graben-Prydz Bay, Ross Embayment, and Weddell Embayment.
- Decipher regional and larger scale vertical movements of the Antarctic crust and the role these phases and events played in determining paleoclimate, location of major sedimentary basins and regional climate, in such areas as Marie Byrd Land, Ellsworth Mountains, Transantarctic Mountains, and the margins of East Antarctica from 20 degrees West to Prydz Bay.
- Establish the existence, extent, glacial-deglacial, and sedimentary record of epicontinental seas on Antarctica, in such regions as the Wilkes Land continental shelf margin and in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin.
Geological Time, And Relative And Absolute Dating Systems: The primary objective of "ground-truthing" seismic stratigraphy, through coupling these data with well documented drillhole data, must involve consideration of geological time at several resolution scales. The ANTOSTRAT mandate cannot be attained without the existence and application of a robust chronostratigraphic framework in the five Antarctica regions of principal interest. As a minimum standard, the chronostratgraphic framework should be capable of resolving problems of correlation, recognition of time spans, establishing rates of processes, etc, to at least a resolution of 2 million years. Such a capability would allow solution of major earth science problems and issues within Antarctica; and the accurate relating of Antarctic marine and terrestrial events with coeval events elsewhere on Earth. Regrettably, Antarctic Cretaceous and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy still lags far behind that available to workers in other regions of the globe (Webb, Appendix 7.1, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Identify from among continuously cored drillholes in several regions, those successions that provide near continuous records of marine sedimentation and might serve as representative regional standard sections. Develop detailed data bases on biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, biochronostratigraphy, geochronology and chronostratigraphy, etc, for each regional standard section.
- Where possible, and in the interests of providing longer spans of time coverage in a specific regions, several regional standard sections might be combined to provide a comprehensive regional standard section. This will require a sound understanding of stratigraphic overlap and gap problems between regional standard sections.
- Attempt, by use of a wide variety of correlation and dating tools, to relate Antarctic comprehensive regional standard sections with high (time) resolution schemes developed and successfully used in the Southern Ocean, Australia and New Zealand.
- Identify and encourage investigation and use of new absolute and relative dating technologies that might contribute to improved chronostratigraphy of Antarctic Cretaceous and Cenozoic rocks.
Continental Shelf Sedimentary Basins: The most direct record of Antarctic climatic history over the past 130 million years is to be found in the blanket of sediment that covers the Antarctic continental shelf. The sediment pile ranges in thickness from zero up to approximately 14 km. The location of greatest thickness, the sedimentary basins, are typically tens to hundreds of kilometers across and vary in shape from subcircular depressions to half grabens to linear troughs. From limited knowledge obtained thus far on the age of the sediments in the basins, there appear to have been two main periods of basin development; the first a consequence of Gondwanide fragmentation during the Cretaceous resulted in the syn-rift episode of basin filling; and the second, post-rift phase, occurred during the Paleogene and or Neogene. Understanding the differential subsidence history of the numerous continental shelf basins around the Antarctic margins is important for two reasons. First, basin subsidence was active in the different basins at different times and a combining of stratigraphic records is necessary for the reconstruction of complete histories in any single region. Second, rapid subsidence has the potential for providing complete and high resolution records. However, success in piecing together records from different basins requires unambiguous correlation and an accurate chronology, for which data from both seismic surveys and drillhole must be combined (Barrett, Appendix 7.7, this report).
Priorities and goals
- Identify drillsites and obtain cores from sedimentary basins on the Antarctic continental shelf likely to provide a stratal record representing syn-rift post-rift and other tectonic phases or events in individual basin evolution, and likely to offer complete or near complete coverage of the Cretaceous and Cenozoic time span.
- Recover Cretaceous-Cenozoic marine successions from continental shelf environments that portray the principal geological events in terrestrial (or continental) and near-shore marine Antarctica; and at the same time were directly connected to the circum-Antarctic oceans throughout their history.
- Identify specific marine successions from continental shelf basins in different regions which because of their high sedimentation rates, lack of hiatuses, and fossil content, might be designated as regional standard sections, and offer potential for improving Antarctic chronostratigraphy, geochronology, biostratigraphy, and magneto-stratigraphy.
- Identify sedimentary basins likely to provide drillcore successions that span the pre-glacial and glacial phases of Antarctic Late Phanerozoic history.
- Identify sedimentary basins likely to provide a highly conformable stratigraphy that might be utilized in advancing understanding of sequence stratigraphy and eustatic oscillations at 2nd order supercycle and cycle (3rd order and higher) resolutions; and which is directly related through lithofacies analysis of the same successions to glacial-deglacial cycles driven by changing terrestrial climates.
- Identify high sedimentation-high resolution successions that permit detailed investigation of ice sheet-shelf or glacier driven depositonal systems and cycles, where cycles might represent centenial and millenial durations.
Paleoceanography And Circum-Antarctic Deep-Sea Marine Biosphere History: Significant Mesozoic-Paleogene global and regional paleoenvironmental events that help delineate the evolution of the Southern Ocean are discussed in detail by Harwood and Wise (1995, in P.-N. Webb and G.S. Wilson, editors, Byrd Polar Research Center, Report No. 10, pp. 47-53). A selection of primary objectives is provided here. See also
Wise, Appendix 7.8, this report)
Priorities and goals:
- Recover core from Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous successions in the Weddell Sea-Dronning Maud Land region that will contribute knowledge of the early break-up history, the development of anoxic black shale basins and ventilation of these basins later in the Early Cretaceous.
- Recover core from any part of the continental margin that provides complete stratigraphic coverage for the Upper Cretaceous; thereby contributing to the development of high latitude chronostratigraphy and biostratigraphy, and improved understanding of latest Mesozoic ocean circulation patterns; and also contributing to biogeographic distribution of taxa and their evolutionary details.
- Recover core from uppermost Cretaceous (Maastrichtian)-lowermost Tertiary (Danian) successions anywhere along the continental margin, to be used in deciphering the biotic impact at high latitudes of the hypothesized Chicxulub (Mexico) impact structure, including records of extinction and survival among planktic and benthic fossil groups; and consider the possibility that Antarctica served as a refugium from K/T devastation so apparent in the lower latitudes.
- Recover core from Paleocene-Eocene boundary marine successions anywhere along the Antarctic margin that permits further investigation of the hypothesized Late Paleocene Thermal Maximum Event (first proposed from Maud Rise), the associated reversal of latitudinal global circulation patterns, and the accompanying massive global benthic extinction event.
- Recover core from Paleogene successions anywhere along the Antarctic marine margin that provides further data on the inception of glaciation, particularly regional data on the pre-glacial-glacial transition, and the relationship between these events and the global shift from greenhouse to icehouse climates. Current interpretations based on in situ evidence suggests that this threshold occurs within the Upper Eocene.
- Using new core materials from Southern Ocean sites around Antarctica, continue the development of high resolution biostratigraphic schemes based on both calcareous and siliceous microfossil groups; direct attention to studies which emphasize relationships between Cretaceous-Cenozoic marine faunal biogeography, high latitude seaway circulation paths around and through Antarctica, and the tectonic influence on ocean water gateways and barriers; and consider the evolutionary relationships between Paleoaustral and Neoaustral biogeograhic elements to lower latitude shelf to abyssal provinces.
Glaciomarine Sedimentary Processes, Events And Stratigraphy: Glacial and climatic records are best inferred by using quantitative, predictive models based on well documented processes that are active today. In the high latitude marine there is potential for major variability on environments and processes in both time and space. This translates as rapid vertical and lateral changes in stratigraphy and lithofacies (Powell, Appendix 7.9, this report)
Priorities and goals:
- Execute closely coordinated programs of three dimensional seismic surveying and stratigraphic drilling and core recovery at very high resolutions.
- Establish a series of standard successions in which characterization of unique seismic and sedimentologic stratigraphies, structures and geometries are linked.
- Characterize subglacial and grounding line depositional systems with a view to interpreting glacial dynamics in this crucial environment.
- Develop quantitative models for accumulation of glacial sedimentary packages on the Antarctic margin, with the aim of integrating glacial geological and glaciological modeling.
Terrestrial Geology: The Late Phanerozoic terrestrial record is the most poorly understood of all major continental landmasses. Perhaps as little as 15 percent of the last 130 m.y. is documented, even to a reconnaissance level. Prior to the Pliocene, terrestrial environmental and climatic scenario's depend almost enirely on analyses of proxy data recovered from the continental shelves and deep sea by the Deep Sea Drilling Project and Ocean Drilling Program. Because of the probability of recycling and other problems, such data cannot usually be used to make high time resolution interpretations of events in specific regions of Antarctica. Much of the existing Cretaceous and Cenozoic terrestrial data is derived from locations along the margins of West and East Antarctica, e.g. Antarctic Peninsula, Amery Graben-Prince Charles Mountains, and the Transantarctic Mountains. Central themes of the ANTOSTRAT initiative involve consideration of past climates (glaciation and deglaciation), sediment budgets, tectonic histories, and sea level oscillation, etc, all interpreted primarily from the continental shelf data but strongly influenced by the terrestrial record. It follows then, that investigation of Antarctica's terrrestrial realm must be accorded renewed urgency
(Webb, Appendix 7.10, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Accord the highest priority to geophysical surveying beneath the West and East Antarctic Ice Sheets; with emphasis on close contour sub-ice sheet topographic mapping, structural geology, delineation and extent of possible Cretaceous-Cenozoic sedimentary basins, recognition of mountain uplands and principal drainage systems, and the existence of major tectonic features. Such a program might be couple with glaciology programs.
- Plan sub-ice deep stratigraphic drilling legs. Any future drilling on land should be well distributed geographically in the initial phases. The basic geology for vast areas of the Antarctic interior is unknown and all regional programs should maintain a strong reconnaissance survey element.
- Geophysical and geological drilling activities should have a strong regional element,
on the assumption that the terrestrial record in different parts of Antarctica is not identical and involved histories that evolved within discrete mega-drainage systems. It is recommended that regional Southern Ocean ODP drilling and on-land drilling programs in the same region or sector be closely coordinated and perhaps treated as linked longitudinal transects.
- Encourage the development and testing of drilling systems that are capable of operating through a 2,000 to 3,000 meter ice column and sampling a variety of rock in sub-ice sheet environments.
- Immediate priority should be accorded plans to conduct geophysical and geological drilling in the trunk drainage systems that occur at many localities around the periphery of Antarctica, and might have served the role of sediment traps or basins, e.g. Beardmore and Amery valley systems.
- Refine existing outcrop geology in the continental margin areas, placing emphasis on those locations where stratigraphy and volcanic geology (ash deposits) can be combined to improve chronostratigraphy
- Using new drillhole/drillcore data obtained in terrestrial settings, compile stratigraphies, biostratigraphies, and chronostratigraphies; correlate these with offshore marine basins; and address time/space issues related to tectonic events, paleotopography, landscape evolution and weathering, glacial history and paleoclimate, and past marine invasions of the continent
Antarctic Seismic Stratigraphy: Seismic stratigraphic surveys have been completed across nearly all accessible regions of the Antarctic margin, resulting in the collection of more than 300,000 km of small-airgun single-channel data (SCS) and nearly 200,000 km of large-airgun multichannel seismic reflection data (MCS). A very detailed discussion is provided in (Cooper, Appendix 7.11, this report,).
Priorities and goals:
- Collect drillhole and sediment core data to contribute to the ground-truthing of seismic data.
- Expand and intensify acoustic data in some areas to support drillcore studies (e.g. high resolution site studies); and tie drillhole sample sites to seismic grids.
- Establish standard profiles in each geographic region for calibration of acoustic systems.
- Develop a catalog of acoustic facies and geometries for seismic features on all segments of the Antarctic margin, to establish, with ground truth information, a circum-Pacific seismic sequence stratigraphy model.
- Systematically drill and core characteristic facies and features to determine their depositional paleoenvironments (e.g. marine, proximal glacial, subglacial, etc) and relation to ice and sea level change.
- Develop a circum-Antarctic model for the evolution of the Antarctic icehouse seismic stratigraphies, i.e. the up-section progress from "normal-depth nonglacial" to overdeepened glacial" margin.
- Establish "global" stratigraphic links, i.e. shelf to abyssal basin; circum-Antarctic, etc.
- Extract additional information from seismic data using seismic waveform information, e.g. amplitude, phase, etc.
Seismic Characterization And Physical Properties: Physical property measurements are particularly well suited for down-hole logging. It provides advantages in that records are continuous stratigraphically and results will be much closer to real in situ conditions. A number of different sensors, combined in a variety of ways are available. For studies of Cenozoic sediments the most essential parameters to measure are, P-wave velocity, bulk density, lithology and magnetic properties (susceptibility and polarity). These are all standard parameters measured in ODP logging operations. Acoustic velocity can be measured with a vertical resolution of 20 cm and magnetic susceptibility with a resolution of 25 mm. Lithology and porosity information can be obtained from natural gamma tools combined with neutron tools (Solheim, Appendix 7.12, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Improve interpretation of depositional environments and extend these regionally via correlation of core data to seismic stratigraphy.
- Measure a standardized set of physical properties and geotechnical parameters for all drill core
- Include a downhole logging program (using slimline tools in most measurements) in all drilling operations on the Antarctic continental margin. Define a minimum number of parameters that should be measured and standardize these to the highest degree possible.
- Obtain near-continuous, high resolution (1cm) non-destructive MST (Multi Sensor Track) measurements of stratigraphic variations in cores. Parameters such as velocity, density, natural gamma radiation and magnetic susceptibility, may provide direct records of paleoenvironmental variations.
- Where appropriate, use MST data in producing composite records from multi-hole drill sites. This procedure is especially useful in linking multiple shallow drillholes on transects. MST data should be used in choosing sampling intervals for geotechnical testing.
- Geotechnical tests should be an integral part of the drillhole physical properties program, and will provide information on compaction (ice and or sediment loading), permeability, and erosion
Paleoclimate Modeling Of Glacial And Climatic History: The major deficiencies that remain outstanding in paleoclimate modeling of Antarctica center on model inadequacies and insufficient or poorly understood data by which to establish model boundary conditions and evaluation. A coordinated plan is required for meshing improved geological data and improved models. The central goal of the exercise is to use global and regional climate models to help understand glacial and other climatic events important in the history of Antarctica, and to relate these to past and possible future global climate. Climate models play a key role in helping to synthesize and integrate our understanding of major glacial and climatic events and can also be used to suggest correspondences and inconsistencies in the interpretation of these events from the geologic record. Model results can also be used as a guide to where future geologic data needs are greatest (Ogelsby, Appendix 7.13, this report).
As a result of deliberations at the Hobart Workshop, a series of time slice or time interval window modeling targets were identified. These were selected because reasonably well documented global, hemispheric and or regional events, phases or trends can be associated with each. These significant "moments" in past time provide logical starting points for a large scale modeling experiment.
Priorities and goals:
- Early-Late Cretaceous (130 Ma-75 Ma) &endash; This is a particularly critical interval in the structural (plate tectonic), terrestrial, paleoceanographic and biological evolution of the southern high latitudes. It marks a significant transition from a single polar located Gondwanide supercontinent to a gradually more fragmented array of large landmasses, separated by new seaways and oceanic circulation patterns. Details of climate trends and episodes are poorly understood. Both marine and terrestrial Paleoaustral paleontological data point to relatively high diversity and productivity, and relative warmth at very high latitudes, despite strongly developed seasonality and low light levels during much of the year. There is no evidence for Cretaceous glaciation in Antarctica and a major question centers on whether hothouse conditions so prevalent in other parts of Earth were also a feature of the Antarctic region.
- Mid Campanian cooling (~75 Ma) &endash; This event was marked by the development of an highly provincial Austral flora and fauna, and represents the likely beginning of a general global cooling that continued into the Cenozoic. The effect of this cooling on Antarctica is currently uncertain, but may represent the first "excursion" of a thermally isolated Antarctica toward eventual icehouse conditions.
- Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (~65 Ma) &endash; Current consensus suggests that this boundary represents a major impact event and is associated with biotic mass extinction. The effect in Antarctica is uncertain, and it is currently debated as to whether the extinctions were instantaneous or step-wise, or as severe in high Austral latitudes relative to the rest of the global system.
- Late Paleocene-Eocene thermal boundary (~52 Ma) - This boundary represents a large global anomalous warming event (Cenozoic thermal maximum and level of a major extinction in the benthic environment) from which progressive Cenozoic cooling commenced. A major question is the degree to which this warming affected Antarctica and it flora and fauna. More significant is the impact of this event on the organization of global ocean circulation patterns.
- Eocene (~52 to ~34 Ma) &endash; Onset of major glaciation in Antarctica. This entails a diachronous phase of climate deterioration that probably occurred at different times and places in the interior and at margins of Antarctica.
- Eocene-Oligocene boundary (~34 Ma) &endash; This represents a major global cooling threshold that is strongly delineated in oxygen isotope data. The distinction between ocean water temperatures and ice volume is uncertain. This boundary is a culmination of temperature decline during the Eocene. What role did Antarctic glaciation play in this event, particularly in relation to an apparent continent-wide ice sheet expansion to the continental margins.
- Mid Oligocene transition (~30 Ma) &endash; This represents a major global cooling, and of more significance for Antarctica, it is associated with a major eustatic fall that represents a likely large expansion in the ice volumes on Antarctica.
- Mid Miocene transition (~15 Ma) &endash; This represents a major global cooling that may also point to "full" thermal isolation of Antarctica from the remainder of the globe, and possibly related to the full development of the Circum-Antarctic Current, and possibly as well or instead of, to a significant sea ice apron around Antarctica. It may also be associated with the complete re-glaciation of Antarctica.
- Latest Miocene-Earliest Pliocene (~6 to 4.2 Ma) &endash;Possibly this interval involved the development of full glaciation of West Antarctica; and possibly also, the closure of the intercratonic seaways linking the south Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
- Early-Mid Pliocene climate amelioration (~4.2 to 2.5 Ma) &endash; Global warming during this interval may be associated with major reduction in ice volume on Antarctica and with possible elimination of ice sheets in some areas.
- Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary (<2.5 Ma) &endash; Onset of significant Northern Hemisphere ice sheet glaciation occurred during this interval, however, the influence on and by Antarctica is less certain and requires clarification.
In all these experiments, global and regional paleogeographic, paleotopographic and paleobathymetric data are needed to establish boundary conditions as accurately as possible. Information on external forcings, such as broad estimates of atmospheric carbon dioxide and changes in solar luminosity, etc. are also needed. Detailed site reconstructions will be essential for subsequent evaluation and interpretation of model simulations.
Regional Earth Science Issues
Antarctic Peninsula: The Antarctic Peninsula is a narrow upland region, comparatively well exposed, with broad flanking continental shelves. Study of the onshore geology is actively pursued by many SCAR countries, and a considerable marine data base exists for the readily accessible Pacific continental margin. Geoscience research is, in many fields, well beyond the reconnaissance stage, and ready for more focused attention. The original ANTOSTRAT Antarctic Peninsula Working group concerned itself with subduction neotectonics, and both past and present back-arc extension as well as investigations of the glacial margin. The Antarctic Peninsula region contains an excellent onshore Late Cretaceous and Paleogene shallow-water section with few breaks, in the James Ross Island region, which has already been investigated but has further potential. The Paleogene and Neogene onshore record is less continuous but compares well with other regions of Antarctica. The record of "full" glaciation offshore is extremely well-ordered and well-preserved, and was recently investigated during ODP Leg 178 operations (Fig. 4). It is estimated that the onset of grounded ice sheet extension to the continental shelf edge dates from late Miocene (7-10 Ma), significantly later than in East Antarctica. Barker, Appendix 7.14, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Execute ODP margin drilling to examine Antarctic glacial history. Develop a margin transect of validated acoustic/lithologic facies comparisons for use in other regions of Antarctica.
- Extend ODP glacial transect inshore and to earlier Cenozoic successions by drilling mid-shelf sedimentary basins, and compare with other regions of Antarctica. This goal could possibly be achieved by shallow drilling of the shelf between Anvers Island and Adelaide Island.
- Develop a broad chronostratigraphic and paleo-environmental record for the Late Cretaceous and Paleogene in the northern Antarctic Peninsula region, and thereby support future generations of numerical models of Antarctic climate change. This will require additional onshore geological investigations, supplemented by offshore sampling by shallow drilling techniques.
- Examine sediment provenance as a way of establishing the uplift history of the Antarctic Peninsula. Numerical models suggest that an elevated Antarctic Peninsula is an important influence on continental climate. ODP and shallow drilling at inshore sites will be required.
Weddell Sea: The Weddell Sea region was involved in the earliest rifting events associated with the break-up of the Gondwana supercontinent. After South America and Africa had separated from Antarctica, the rifting process continued into the recent Lazarev and Riiser Larsen seas to split off India. The break-up of these continental masses resulted in the creation of new restricted basins. At approximately 130 Myr a major reorganization of the seafloor spreading occurred and Maud Rise, a large volcanic feature developed. A hiatus lasting from 110-120 to 40 Myr was documented in ODP holes 692 and 693. During the same time span oceanic crust formed along the South Atlantic/Indian ocean sector of East Antarctica. Although Cenozoic glacial conditions are thought to have occurred in the region during the late Paleogene and Neogene this is not well documented. For example, it is not known with precision when and how often phases of the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf extended to the shelf break in the late Neogene. (Jokat, Appendix 7.15, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Investigate post-Cretaceous environments along the Weddell Sea margin of East Antarctica; examining the early rifting event in the Mesozoic and the subsequent glacial history; and comparing this evolution with other Antarctic margin sites. This will require acquisition of high quality seismic data with sufficient spatial coverage to define the seismic architecture in several wide swaths across the continental margin. Locate optimum sites where ground-truthing of seismic data (age calibration of acoustic units) may be undertaken via deep and possibly shallow drilling.
- Elucidate the glacial history record in the deep basin off Dronning Maud Land (East Antarctica) by correlating seismic data and drillhole information along channel levee complexes, date the W4 unconformity in order to comprehend the onset and timing of glaciation in East Antarctica, and core the pelagic sediments of the Polarstern seamounts to basement, to reveal a long term climatic record for the Atlantic sector of East Antarctica. The large amount of multichannel seismic data available in this area has been interpreted in glacial history terms but stratigraphy, environments and age control demands a comprehensive drilling program. A drilling program rationale is set forth in ODP proposal 503 (Fig. 5).
- Improve knowledge of the glacial history of marine continental shelf sediments; with emphasis on data from foreset sediments along the Dronning Maud Land coast. Decipher vertical and lateral character of major stratigraphic units and interpret record of ice sheet/ice shelf activity over the continental shelf. Combine these data with adjacent deep sea data sets. This program will require acquisition of detailed seismic, bathymetric and side scan data, and the use of shallow drilling technology to verify seismic interpretations.
- Investigate the Mesozoic origin and evolution of the Weddell, Lazarev, and Riiser Larsen basins; with emphasis on the relationship between Gondwana break-up and basin formation and evolution, changing paleoceanography (current circulation, geochemistry, paleontology, opening and closing of gateways, black shale genesis, basin ventilation, and transition from "warm" Cretaceous to "cold" Cenozoic climate regimes). These objectives are detailed in ODP proposal #503. Additional sampling can be executed via dredging and shallow drilling. Sampling sites and areas include, northeast Antarctic Peninsula shelf, Larsen shelf, Ronne Trough, Filchner Trough, Explora Escarpment, Astrid Ridge, and Gunnerus Ridge. Further pre-drilling/sampling surveys should include, aeromagnetic and aerogravity, seismic, and bathymetric data. The aero-geophysical program (EMAGE) was commenced in 1996-97. A Polarstern cruise is scheduled for 2000 to acquire additional seismic and bathymetric data in the Lazarev and Riiser Larsen seas.
Prydz Bay Region: The Prydz Bay region is key to understanding the early history of break-up between Antarctica and Greater India and the development of the Indian Ocean. The major crustal and tectonic feature of this region is the prominent north-east south-west trending rift system, the Lambert Graben, which crosses the continental margin obliquely and extends into the continent toward the south. Two parallel rift grabens, divided by a crystalline basin high occur within the shelf, continental slope and Prydz Bay, representing a typical "Double Rift" system, with intracontinental and pericontinental branches The pericontinental rift branch exhibits transfer faults with an offset of up to 100 km. Prydz Bay was probably one of the first Antarctic basins to receive Cenozoic sediments and these are known to crop out on the sea floor. At the present time about 20% of the East Antarctic ice Sheet drains through the Lambert Graben into Prydz Bay and it was likely to have acted as a major trunk drainage system throughout the Cenozoic. Included in this catchment are the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains, a possible initial ice accumulation region within East Antarctica.
The Mac.Robertson Shelf west of Prydz Bay also contains a record of the rifting history of this margin. It is a scalped shelf with Precambrian basement, Mesozoic and pre-glacial Cenozoic sediments cropping out at the seafloor. The inner shelf half graben is filled with Cretaceous sediments. Gently dipping Jurassic, Paleocene and Eocene sediments underlie the outer shelf. The Paleocene and Eocene sediments are clearly post-rift but the it is not clear how the Jurassic sediments fit into the tectonic history of the margin. The Cretaceous age of the syn-rift sediments is at odds with the interpretations of rifting of India from Gondwana based on evidence from the Jurassic age of oceanic crust off Western Australia. (O'Obrien and Leitchenkov, Appendix 7.16, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Obtain additional seismic, sidescan and multibeam mapping data to refine drillhole site selection in Prydz Bay and on the Mac.Robertson Shelf; with emphasis on trough mouth fan and continental drift deposits.
- Conduct ODP drilling (ODP proposal # 490 submitted)(Fig. 5) and shallow drilling campaigns, and piston core programs in Prydz Bay and Mac.Robertson Shelf.
- Investigate pre-glacial, transitional and glacial phases of deposition in Prydz Bay and the Mac.Robertson Shelf; characterizing Cretaceous, Paleocene and Eocene successions.
- Investigate the Pliocene-Pleistocene history of Prydz Bay, documenting the frequency and timing of glacial advances and retreats by the Amery Glacier to the shelf edge, and interaction of these events with adjacent deep sea regions. The Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf has drained much of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet for millions of years and so proposed shelf sampling sites provide controls on ice sheet behavior. It is believed that the Prydz Channel ice stream of Lambert Glacier built a major trough mouth fan in the early Pliocene and successions are relatively undisturbed by slumping and reworking. Trough mouth fan and drifts on the continental rise probably preserve interglacial biogenic sediments and may therefore preserve a near continuous record for the last 4 million years.
- Investigate the paleoclimate record of Beaver Lake, a site that probably preserves a good Quaternary record. Drilling from this ice-covered lake is proposed, preceded by completion of a 25 km line of through-ice soundings, together with 3.5 kHz surveys and gravity coring.
- Continue a program of investigation of the late Cenozoic Pagadroma Group in the Prince Charles Mountains, with emphasis on marine and terrestrial stratigraphy, sedimentology , paleontology and biostratigraphy. Results from this program would enhance understanding of the late Cenozoic history of the region and possibly allow correlation with similar age sediments in Prydz Bay.
Wilkes Land Margin: The Wilkes Land margin is a key area by which to reconstruct the evolution of the Wilkes Land continental margin and Indian Ocean region during the last 130 m.y. This area provides one of the few locations along the margin of East Antarctica where Mesozoic rocks are exposed at the seafloor. The area lies at the northern limit of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin, a major intracontinental depression that extends ~1500 km towards the South Pole inland of the Transantarctic Mountains, and is ~500 km wide in places. This basin may be the repository of a Paleogene-Neogene marine and terrestrial record, one that preserves pre-glacial, transitional and glacial sediments. Basins on the Wilkes Land margin have probably retained the northernmost portion of this record. During Paleogene-Neogene glacial phases the Polar Front probably came close to this margin of Antarctica and so there is the potential of strong deep sea paloceanographic influences in basins along the margin. Deep inner shelf basins contain an ultra high resolution Quaternary-Holocene record that has the potential of recording ice margin fluctuations (Escutia, Appendix 7.17, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Investigate the onset of glaciation at the Wilkes Land continental margin, and indirectly in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin based on deep (ODP proposal 482 submitted)(Fig. 5) and shallow sampling across the continental shelf.
- Conduct intermediate to high resolution seismic surveys to define potential drill site locations; to concentrate these efforts in inner continental shelf troughs, outer continental shelf trough mouth fans and continental rise drifts; to strengthen portrayal of seismic facies architectures; to improve bathymetric mapping, and to correlate these data with those obtained from drilling campaigns.
- Link late Neogene and older seismic and drillhole stratigraphy on transects across the continental shelf (ice proximal) and on continental slope (drifts), to better understand glacial-deglacial cycle history and depositional systems.
- To investigate subglacial basin and ice drainage system evolution, to estimate sediment volume transport between terrestrial and marine environments through time, and relate these data to offshore depocenters.
- Investigate Hakurei seamount and Seamount B, to determine composition of these subbottom highs, and to use these data to determine the time and processes involved with separation of Australia from Antarctica in this region.
Ross Sea: The Ross Sea lies along the Pacific margin of the Jurassic rift that is delineated by the extensive dolerite sills of the Ferrar Group of the Transantarctic Mountains, and coincides in part with the active Cenozoic West Antarctic Rift System. The Transantarctic Mountains, one of the world's great mountain chains, forms, for a large part of its length, the rift shoulder of the West Antarctic Rift System. It is over 4,000 km long, reaches elevations of over 4,000 m, and is block-faulted and back-tilted towards the East Antarctic craton. The complementary rift shoulder in the Edward VII Peninsula and western Marie Byrd Land is far more subdued and has more of a horst and graben (basin and range) style of morphology that is mostly ice covered and extends about 1000 m above and below sea level.
The Ross Sea and its southern continuation under the Ross Ice Shelf forms the Ross Embayment, which is about 500 m deep and generally has a gentle ridge and valley morphology with a maximum depth (1200 m) along the western margin, adjacent to the Transantarctic Mountains. The sedimentary basins in the Ross Sea were probably formed largely by rifting processes during and since break-up of this part of Gondwanaland in the Late Cretaceous. There were two phases of basin formation. An initial regional extension phase related to the Gondwana break-up episode, and a possibly mid-Cenozoic phase, which was localized to the western Ross Sea. Uplift of the Transantarctic Mountains appears to have occurred in several phases commencing at about 115 Ma. The structural and deposition framework of the Ross Sea is formed by four principal depocenters, the Victoria Land basin, the Northern basin, the Central Trough and the Eastern basin. Seismic data linked to drillhole information has shown that some thousands of meters of sediments are present in the deepest part of the Ross depocenters. The oldest sediments probably range back into the Paleocene, Cretaceous, and possibly the early Mesozoic. The presence of Eocene and Oligocene sediments have been confirmed in drillholes and appear to be widespread in the western and central Ross Sea. Neogene sediments also appear to be very widespread, having been documented in drillholes in the Ross Sea, at its western margins, and within the trunk valley fjordal systems that traverse the Transantarctic Mountains.
Late Neogene terrestrial glacial successions in the Transantarctic Mountain highlands provide potential for future linking of cratonic and rift basin stratigraphy, investigation of sediment transport budgets between terrestrial and marine regions, tectonic history, paleotopography and glacial history.
The Ross Sea region has several other unique attributes for Antarctica. It is the largest and most accessible southern high latitude continental shelf. In terms of global comparisons it is one of the largest rift mountain-basin structures, with extensive linear volcanic provinces (<40 Ma) along the western Ross Sea and Marie Byrd Land rift margins. Shelf basins have been long-lived catchments for ice and sediment for parts of both the East and West Antarctic ice sheets. The ice sheet, ice shelf, and open marine interfaces have interacted and fluctuated over at least 40 m.y., resulting in a variety of proximal and distal glacigene facies. Paleocoastlines are known with reasonable certainty. The proximity of volcanic provinces provides an opportunity to develop a sound chronostratigraphy via dating of rock and tephra-based techniques. Given the wealth of information on craton margin and rift basin multi-unit stratigraphy, widespread unconformities, lithofacies trends and relationships, biostratigraphy, and environmental interpretations, future research in the Ross Sea region is likely to evolve toward detailed interpretations of the respective roles of tectonic, paleoclimate and eustatic factors in the determining the histories of the extensive continental shelf basins in this part of Antarctica (Davey, Appendix 7.18, this report).
Priorities and goals:
- Conduct a ship-based deep drilling program (ODP Proposal 489 submitted (Fig. 5), currently under ODP consideration and peer review), fast-ice deep drilling program (Cape Roberts Project, currently underway, 1997-2000), ship-based shallow drilling program (in planning stages), and ice shelf-based shallow program (in discussion stages), all directed toward the thematic targets enumerated below.
- Conduct further seismic surveys directed toward providing complete site surveys for drilling programs aimed at recovering geological materials associated with thematic targets enumerated below; and also associated with refining ground truth for the existing seismic data base in the Ross Sea region.
- Initiate a program of high resolution seismic investigation aimed toward characterizing discrete seismic facies and linking these with rock stratigraphy and interpreted lithofacies recovered from drilling campaigns.
- Elucidate past climate and glacial history, especially in regard to the origins and subsequent history of Antarctic sheets, including the frequency and rate of major phases of ice build-up and ice-decline; and contribute these data to forecasting rates and scale of future climate change.
- Synthesize and extend Cenozoic terrestrial glacial geological records, relate these data to vertical tectonic histories along the rift margins, and to evolving paleotopography and associated phases of upland denudation; and couple these studies with concomitant rift basin subsidence studies.
- Relate continental shelf geological and geophysical data bases with those of adjacent areas of the deep Southern Ocean; with emphasis on stratigraphic and biostratigraphic correlations and seismic stratigraphy.
- Decipher in both the terrestrial and marine records, potential earth system linkages with significant global, hemispheric and Southern Ocean trends, phases, and events, e.g. tectonically induced changes of intracratonic and intercratonic ocean distribution and circulation, eustatic oscillation thresholds, major thresholds in physical paleoceanography, and associated faunal overturns and restructuring of biogeography.
- Design and execute a long-range program directed toward developing a high resolution chronostratigraphy for the Ross Sea, directing emphasis towards the application of geochronology, magnetostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and biogeochronology; and link this temporal scheme with those developed for other regions of Antarctica; and attempt correlation with established schemes developed for the Southern Ocean, southern temperate latitudes, and the global standard scheme. This priority and goal is central to the entire ANTOSTRAT enterprise, and highlights the Ross Sea-Transantarctic Rift System as possessing one of the most complete basin successions in Antarctica. This program will entail a major international collaborative effort in synthesizing existing data, obtaining new data by drilling, coordinated geophysics and geological programs, and the assembly of designated Ross Sea Standard Sections into a Ross Sea Composite Section, and Ross Sea Chronostratigraphy, for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge travel assistance grants from the Scientific Committee On Antarctic Research and the national Antarctic programs of the workshop participant's countries.
Dr Ian Goodwin of the SCAR Global Change Program office at Hobart arranged the amenities used during the meeting and offered many forms of assistance during the pre-workshop planning phase. We thank the Cooperative Research Centre, University of Hobart for providing the workshop meeting facilities. The compilers also extend thanks to all authors for their extensive contributions to the workshop and report, and to the many reviewers within the SCAR Geology and Solid Earth Working Groups and earth science community who provided comments.
Peter-Noel Webb and Alan K. Cooper
Workshop Conveners
Note: The electronic version of the report, distributed by e-mail attachment, does not contain the six figures. If desired, the 6 TIF files for the figures can be obtained from the report compilers via e-mail request. The figures are the same as those distributed with the last draft of the report (7/98).
Figure Captions
- Map of Antarctica showing locations of major Cenozoic prograding sedimentary sequences, for the five areas around Antarctica that have been studied by the ANTOSTRAT project. These sequences lie at the seaward end of inferred former ice streams (Cooper and Webb, 1994).
- Fragmentation of parts of Gondwana super-continent and evolution of Antarctic Plate, during the Cretaceous and Cenozoic (Modified after Lawver, Gahagan and Coffin, 1992).
- Map showing location of multichannel seismic reflection profiles from the Antarctic continental margin (Cooper and Webb, 1992; modified from Behrendt, 1990)
- Deep Sea Drilling Project and Ocean Drilling Program sites completed in the southern Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans since 1972. ODP drillsites around the Antarctic Peninsula (in small type) were completed in early 1998 as part of Leg 178. These sites were proposed by the ANTOSTRAT Antarctic Peninsula regional working group.
- Proposed locations of Ocean Drilling Program drillsites, as proposed by the Weddell Sea, Prydz Bay, Wilkes Land margin and Ross Sea ANTOSTRAT regional working groups. Proposals for these sites are currently in review.
- Generalized cross section of the Antarctic continental margin showing the geometry and distribution of preglacial and glacial sedimentary sections for areas where the continental shelf has been extensively prograded and aggraded (Cooper and Webb, 1994, modified from Cooper et al., 1993).
Appendices
- Appendix 1: ANTOSTRAT Steering Committee
- Appendix 2: workshop participants
- Appendix 3: selected references
- Appendix 4: ANTOSTRAT Workshop Program
- Appendix 5: Report on Hobart Workshop published in EOS
- Appendix 6: Three documents related to the evolution and implementation of the ANTOSTRAT subcommittee - July 1997 to July 1998
- Appendix 7: Working papers on data bases, current and planned projects, technologies, thematic and regional earth science issues prepared for Hobart Workshop
