You are in: Home » Publications » Reports » Report 16 » Appendix 7
SCAR Report 16
Appendix 7
ANTARCTIC SEISMIC DATA LIBRARY SYSTEM FOR COOPERATIVE RESEARCH (SDLS)
Alan
Cooper, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA
and
Giuliano Brancolini, Osservatoroi Geofisico Sperimentale, Trieste, Italy
I. What is the SDLS?
Purpose
The Antarctic Seismic Data Library System provides open access to multichannel seismic reflection data collected by all countries in Antarctica, to facilitate large-scale cooperative research projects.
How started
- The SDLS was designed in April 1991 by consensus of all countries that collected seismic data in Antarctica, to establish that seismic data were not being concealed for use in the exploitation of Antarctica’s resources.
- In late 1991,
the SDLS was formally implemented under Antarctic Treaty
Consultative Meeting (ATCM) Recommendation XVI-12.
Where located - The SDLS has 11 library branches that are located in 10 countries worldwide.
- Researchers may go to any library branch to inspect Antarctic multichannel seismic reflection data.
Benefits of SDLS
Education
¨ SDLS helps to preserve our privilege to collect seismic data and conduct geoscience studies in Antarctica, by educating the public and Environmental Protection Groups about the benefits of Antarctic seismic research.
Data access
¨ SDLS facilitates large-scale cooperative research projects by providing quick and easy access to digital seismic data.
Data protection
¨ SDLS protects the intellectual property rights of data collectors while stimulating new cooperative research projects.
Data storage
¨ SDLS has many sites for long-term access to Antarctic seismic data, but the SDLS is not a data bank.
II. How does the SDLS function?
How managed
- The SDLS operates under the general auspices of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, and is currently overseen by the ANTOSTRAT Project.
- The SDLS is directed by the ANTOSTRAT Steering committee and the SDLS Coordinator, and operates under guidelines outline in SCAR Report #9 (1992).
How supported
- The SDLS does not receive money from SCAR.
- Overall management costs are currently underwritten by the U.S. National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey and Osservatorio Geofisico Sperimentale (Italy).
- Costs for production of each CD-ROM (used for data distribution), is to be paid by the National Antarctic Program Manager of that country that collected the MCS data, with a subsidy now from the Italian National Research Program. Previously, all production costs had been paid by U.S. Geological Survey.
- The operational costs for SDLS branches are paid by the host organization.
How data are handled and used
Data submission
- MCS users are required to submit their digital processed seismic data (stack sections) to the SDLS within 4 years of data collection.
- Data are submitted on magnetic tapes to Dr. Giuliano Brancolini at OGS in Trieste, Italy.
Data distribution inside SDLS
- MCS data are transferred to CD-ROMs, with special display software, ancillary data sets, and text information.
- The CD-ROMs are mailed to SDLS library branches, where their safety and proper use is overseen by a senior Antarctic researcher.
Data access, use and restrictions
- Researchers may visit any SDLS branch to view the MCS data.
- Library branches must provide a large computer display for the CD-ROM data, and some branches may have paper copies of the data for examination.
- SDLS branches are not allowed to provide copies of data.
- For the first 8 years from time of data collection, there are restrictions on the use of the MCS data – data may only be used in cooperative projects with the data collector, or otherwise only with their permission.
- Thereafter, there are no restrictions on the use of the MCS data.
Data distribution outside SDLS
- After 8 years from time of data collection, CD-ROMs held by the SDLS (other than those at current SDLS branches) are sent to the World Data Center for unrestricted distribution to the public.
- CD-ROMs at SDLS branches stay there indefinitely.
III. What is the future of the SDLS?
What is its function
- The SDLS is mandated by the Antarctic Treaty, but its future usefulness (like its past success) depends on people’s interest in large-scale Antarctic science and solving global problems, for which cooperation is essential.
- The SDLS has many benefits, the most important of which is helping to protect our privilege to conduct geoscience research in Antarctica, by setting an example of giving open access to highly scientifically valued MCS data.
Who will oversee the SDLS
- The general Treaty-mandate and SCAR-oversight will continue.
- Until the end of 1998, SDLS will function under ANTOSTRAT. Thereafter, the SDLS will be under either a new SCAR activity or the SCAR Working Group on Solid Earth Geophysics.
- Day-to-day activities will be coordinated, until January 1, 2000, under a joint working agreement between U.S. Geological Survey and Osservatorio Geofisico Sperimentale, and under the overall guideance of the ANTOSTRAT Steering committee, or equivalent after 1998.
How can the SDLS be more useful
New technologies for data access
- World Wide Web: Many new possibilities that
include
- interactive maps,
- display of data over the web,
- download of data over the web,
- cross-links to other Antarctic geoscience data bases (e.g.,. geologic samples, -physical oceanography, glaciology, etc),
- High-density CD-ROMs: Access to data may be possible via high-density CD-ROMs, made as needed on demand.
- New software included on the CD-ROMs for more varied interactive display and printing of data
- Other?
New data added to library system
- Add land MCS data
- Add all digital Antarctic seismic data
- Add other digital geophysical data (e.g., bathymetry, gravity, magnetics, etc.)
- Other?
New ways to use old data
- Libraries might loan out CD-ROMs for data older than 8 years
- Prior publications and maps might be included with the data on CD-ROM, such as was done with AGU ARS V.68
- Other?
Different way to assure data submissions
- On-time submission of data is a common problem (readily overcome by resetting personal and institutional priorities)
- Positive: Provide incentives (e.g., leadership positions, awards, etc.) for individuals who submit data on time and facilitate cooperative projects.
- Negative: Post names of delinquent PI’s and institution names on Web site.
IV. Issues and questions
Science
Data sharing and use
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of applying the “restricted-open-access” philosophy of the SDLS to other types of data that are commonly needed/collected in large-scale cooperative research projects?
- Would such a worldwide library system for these data encourage and facilitate future cooperative research?
- Or, are there other ways to encourage and assure sharing of geoscience data within “reasonable” time limits, to honor the spirit of the Antarctic Treaty?
Value of old data
Is access to prior data sets of value to planning new cruises and preparing research reports?
Or, are the prior research reports based on the prior data sets adequate for these purposes?
Administrative
Data submission
- Should new guidelines and requirements be implemented and forwarded to the ATCM to assure timely submission of data to the SDLS?
- Should all data collectors be held to the same standards of data submission and payments, regardless of inequalities in economic conditions of different Nations?
- How should the SDLS deal with common statements by data collectors of “inadequately processed and unprocessed data” and “inadequate technical help to provide data”, as reasons for not submitting data on time?
Data Security
- Are current guidelines adequate to protect the intellectual property rights of data collectors while data are in the SDLS (and within 8 years of data collection)?
- Have there been any problems to date?
Finances
- What, if anything, should now be done to help data collectors principally (and SDLS staff, secondarily) to assure that each National Antarctic Program manager pays for the costs of CD-ROM production ($5000/CD) for data collected by their country? (or that equivalent moneys are provided to SDLS by that country for oversight and technical operation – e.g., U.S. and Italy)?
- Should a “finance sub-committee” with members from each country be instituted to assist in assuring that funds are forthcoming to the SDLS?
Other?
- What are the other issues that should be addressed now?
V. Recommendations
- SDLS workshop - A workshop should be held, with participation of the entire MCS data collection community, to review the SDLS operating guidelines and technologies to be used in the coming decade.
- Technical committee - An ad-hoc committee be established to work on technical issues of updating and upgrading the SDLS
- Data submission and payments - Procedures should be clearly outlined and steadfastly implemented to assure uniform application to all data collectors, and timely submission of data and payments to the SDLS.
