You are in: Home » Publications » Reports » Report 16 » Appendix 7
SCAR Report No 16,
Appendix 7
THE LATE PHANEROZOIC TERRESTRIAL REALM
Peter-N. Webb Department of Geological Sciences & Byrd Polar Research Center
The Ohio State
University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Introductory Remarks
The terrestrial record of late Phanerozoic (the last 100
m.y., or Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic) Antarctica is the most poorly understood
of all major continental landmasses,
even after forty years of intensive investigation since the International
Geophysical Year (1957-58) . It is sobering that we have probably documented
no more than
about 15 percent of late Phanerozoic time in the the Antarctic terrestrial
realm. Conclusions and hypotheses based on proxy data rom Deep Sea Drilling
Project
and Ocean Drilling Program investigations provide generalized views of events
on Antarctica at different points in the Cretaceous and Cenozoic but these
are unable to contribute high resolution detail or portray events in specific
regions
of the continent.
It is often observed that Gondwana fragmented and dispersed during the late
Phanerozoic, leaving Antarctica isolated in a high latitude location and
surrounded by a major
ocean system; that a hothouse (greenhouse) world evolved into an icehouse
world during the same interval of time; and that geosphere-hydrosphere-atmosphere
events
in the southern high latitudes were major factors in global evolution from
a non-glacial to a bi-polar (cryospheric) Earth. This scenario seems reasonable,
but Antarctic data sensu stricto has played little direct role in arriving
at
currently accepted doctrine.
The presence of two large ice sheets are the principal reasons why we are
at an impasse as far as the terrestrial record is concerned. We must now
ask ourselves
two major questions. First, should we accept the fact that long-time-scale
global change can and should be resolved, at all temporal levels, via a bigger
and better
proxy (usually paleoceanographic) records. Second, if the answer to this
question is NO, then what actions do we propose to to take to improve the
proximal (continental)
record.
If the decision is made to redouble our efforts in building a more complete
late Phanerozoic terrestrial data base, then we must urgently reassess our
science strategies and also count the cost of the major technological and
logisitic efforts
that will be required.
Available Terrestrial Data
Most existing terrestrial data are documented at points along the margins of the continent. Late Cretaceous and Paleogene data are best developed along the Pacific and Atlantic margins of the Antarctic Peninsula; and most Neogene data derive from the Amery Graben-Prince Charles Mountains and Transantarctic Mountains regions of East Antarctica, and Marie Byrd Land. Little or no information is available from outcrops in the interior of West or East Antarctica, although some indirect information comes from material transported to the contininent margins. A rough estimate suggests the total terrestrial data base is representative of no more than 15 percent of the area of West and East Antarctica. No one will seriously suggest that late Phanerozoic terrestrial history and its impact at the global level can be argued from such a restricted geographic sample. It is fortuitous, however, that in this relatively small area there is a close association of sedimentary and datable volcanic rocks and so what we have had to work with is quite well time-constrained.
Priorities
I now suggest and comment on priorities one might include in a future
long-time-scale terrestrial science plan. This discussion assumes that new
programs of scientific
drilling are necessary and will lead to the successful recovery of geological
materials which provide significantly improved temporal and geographic data
point coverage for the last 100 m.y. It is suggested that each topic discussed
below
be categorized in terms of macro-temporal (5 to10 m.y.), meso-temporal (0
.1 m.y. to 1 m.y. ), and micro-temporal (1 yr to 10,000 yr) scales.
Standard chronostratigraphy, biochronostratigraphy, & magneto-chronostratigraphy
- The best known terrestrial localities occur at the continental margins,
usually in passive and compressional tectonic environments, and with sedimentary
successions
having a close association with volcanic and marine sediments. These areas
will continue to be essential in refining terrestrial histories in marginal
environments,
and in providing linkages to high resolution deep sea data bases. Standard
isotope dating procedures and marine biostratigraphy will continue to provide
temporal
resolutions at the million year scale. However, it is unlikely that the amount
of time accounted for in these areas will be increased substantially.
Terrestrial successions from the tectonically stable continental interior
will be more difficult to date by conventional methods. Opportunities for
refined time control will arise if interdigitating terrestrial and marine
successions and infra-cratonic volcanic provinces are encountered. Ash shower
penetration
across the interior montane and basinal regions might provide additional
time
control for pre-glacial or deglacial episodes on the continent. Wherever
possible these and other methods should be used to provide time-constraints
of major erosional,
weathering and depositional phases; and in assessing the duration of high
latitude geosphere processes.
Paleotopography and geomorphology - Present knowledge of sub-ice sheet topography
relies on a combination of geophysical techniques, glacio-isostatic adjustment
estimations, and hypsometric contouring. Time-slice physiographic contouring
procedures should be devised at macro-temporal scales (i.e. 10 m.y. intervals
of time). More refined paleotopographic controls might be possible for some
intervals of time by the use of accurately dated elevational datums provided
by paleontological,
eustatic and other data. Improved paleotopographic analysis will allow a
pinpointing of both upland topography and the lowland drainage patterns which
acted as major
sediment transport conduits to infra and peri-cratonic freshwater and marine
deltas. Factors to be considered here include: evolving deep crustal tectonic
history, glacial and non-glacial erosion phases and associated crustal adjustments,
ice volume changes and associated glacio-isostacy, characterization of the
terrestrial hydrosphere and cryosphere through time, environmental diversity
(i.e. fluvial,
lacustrine, cold and warm deserts, etc), weathering and pedogenic development,
and landscape evolution.
Terrestrial stratigraphic record - Formal lithostratigraphy (i.e. groups, formations, and members) should be proposed, disconformities highlighted, with both constrained by age control wherever possible. Sub-ice sheet drillhole data should be coupled with acoustic and other geophysical surveys in attempts to understand the thickness and extent of the probable very extensive sub-ice sheet sedimentary basins. Physical property measurements would be undertaken on all core material and drillholes subjected to geophysical logging.
Terrestrial-marine stratigraphic interfaces and relationships - Because of the very extensive coastal zone around Antarctica and the probability of marine advances and retreats across the continental margin and into the continental interior (produced by glacial-deglacial cycles, eustatic oscillations, and tectonic emergence and subsidence), there exists the probability of very complex but meaningful terrestrial-marine succession relationships. This provides a unique opportunity to examine a number of significant regional and global problems. These include ice history-sea level history, mass transport of sediment to the continental shelf basins, maritime paleoclimate, and evolving littoral distribution patterns.
Biosphere - Plate tectonic events, involving the fragmentation of the Gondwana supercontinent, the northward flight of the component fragments, and the geographic isolation of Antarctica in a polar setting, make for a unique late Phanerozoic terrestrial biospheric history. The fate of the greenhouse biological isolates and their icehouse (cryosphere) successors is of central importance in assessing global change in the southern high latitudes. Current terrestrial data bases provide a wealth of information on the paleobotanical record for West and East Antarctica, but the invertebate and vertebrate paleozoological record is surprisingly meager. A concerted effort should be maintained to build on current paleontological data bases through systematic and assemblage studies. Equally important are contributions these floras and faunas make to understanding biogeographic range (provinces) across the continent, and the significance this holds in the tracing paleoenvironment and paleoclimate shifts. Attempts should be made to portray provincial range oscillation at the macro-temporal (5-10 m.y.) and meso-temporal (1 m.y.) scales. Such studies will provide indicators, by geographic and topographic region, of the magnitude and rapidity of climate change, events surrounding the greenhouse to icehouse transition, patterns of evolution, migration, biotic thresholds, refugia, extinctions, and the emergence of the modern Antarctic biota after the demise of the Paleoaustral elements. Studies of taxa at the micro-temporal scale (1 y. to 10,000 yrs), particularly floral elements from the Neogene, provide essential data on survivorship, adaptation, propagation, seasonality, and decadal macro- and microclimate.
Paleoclimate - The documentation of paleoclimate over the past 100 m.yrs., at several levels of temporal resolution, demands synthesis of all available data sets. Firstly, specific data sets are not universally applicable through the entire late Phanerozoic. Secondly, specific data sets are not equally well preserved through all 100 m.y. We must then, use any and all available information that can be gleaned from geosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, atmosphere and biosphere sources. The following factors consitute high priority objectives: variability, periodicity, frequency and amplitude in climate; seasonal and multi-season records including temperature extremes and averages, duration of major climate phases, thermal thresholds, lower atmosphere temperature gradients between terrestrial and marine environments, recognition of the active phases of water (ice, water, rain, snow, cloud, vapor, etc), the recognition of catastrophic change (floods), and comparisons between different terrestrial Paleoaustral regions and between the Paleoaustral region and lower latitudes.
Recommendations
- Prepare a prioritized list of terrestrial thematic and topic
objectives, accompanied by justifications, and technical requirements for
task execution.
- Match terrestrial science objectives against relevant data sets, and
categorize elements of each data set in terms of its/their ability to solve
problems at
various temporal scales.
- Consider whether science priority listings test prevailing assumptions
and hypotheses.
- Discuss where and how future conventional outcrop field geology might
contribute further to science objectives enumerated above.
- Review/preview future priorities in geophysical surveying of regions
presently veiled by the West and East Antarctic ice sheets; with emphasis
on detailed sub-ice
sheet contouring, mapping of sub-ice sheet crustal geology and structure,
and the delineation of extent and thickness of late Phanerozoic sedimentary
basins. These programs should be coupled with site surveys as preparation for
deep
stratigraphic
drilling beneath ice sheets, ice streams and glaciers.
- Plan future sub-ice deep stratigraphic drilling “legs.” Future
drilling should have a wide geographic distribution. The basic geology
for vast areas of the Antarctic interior is unknown and so all regional geological
activities
should maintain a prominent reconnaissance survey element in their
planning.
Regional geophysical surveys are an essential component in this reconnaissance
program. This level of investigation will serve as preparation for
future more specialized drillhole based studies.
- Because studies of late Phanerozoic history over such a large area are likely to have a strong regional flavor, it is suggested that site selection be planned to test the existence of discrete major pre-glacial, glacial, and deglacial drainage systems which probably entered the Southern Ocean at many points around the continent. Close ties should be maintained with those planning future Ocean Drilling Program activity in the peri-Antarctic region. It is recommended that onshore-offshore drilling arrays be expressed as multi-sector longitudinal transects. Obvious candidates for this type of exploration include the Wilkes and Pensacola subglacial basins, Aurora subglacial basin, and Amery Graben.
- There already exists sufficient background information in some areas to allow selection of sub-ice drilling sites. Major “trunk” drainage systems occur at many locations around the periphery of Antarctica and in some instances these extend for hundreds of kilometers into the continent. Results from outcrop geology and earlier stratigraphic drilling projects confirm that these drainage systems have existed through much of the Cenozoic, and that they preserve both terrestrial and marine strata associations. Data from this category of physiographic environment would address many of the priority issues enumerated above, particularly those concerning glacial histories, sea level oscillations, tectonism, and terrestrial-marine linkages. It is recommended that ~300 km long deep drilling transects be planned along one or more of the major “trunk drainage systems,” for example, the Reedy, Shackleton, Beardmore, Byrd, Skelton, and David and Amery glaciers. Drilling transects through the Transantarctic Mountains should include “pinning” sites in the interior subglacial basins and in the marine rift basins seaward of the TAM Front.
